Remember the Carbon Cycle we studied in school ,,,,,,
CO2 IS ESSENTIAL FOR PLANTS,
INCREASED CARBON MEANS MORE PLANTS
WHICH MEANS MORE FOOD AND O2 TO SUPPORT THE INCREASED POPULATION IN THIS ENTIRE WORLD......
THIS IS CONVENIENT TRUTH
WE ARE FOOLING OURSELVES IF WE FOLLOW INCONVENIENT TRUTH AND BY THE TIME WE REALISE WHAT IS THE TRUTH IT WILL BE TOO LATE...........HHHHHH
Because we would have exhausted all our resources fighting our best friends CO2 and GHG and still not have done anything to protect our brethren from the vagaries of flash flooding cyclones etc....
AL GORE AND PATCHURI are rewarded for beautifully mixing the two (POLLUTION & GLOBAL WARMING) and creating a pathetic situation we are in.
This reminds me of a similar situation which was created by America when they attacked IRAQ but where are the weapons of MASS destruction
Who will question Al Gore for creating CO2 which is an essential Gas for our survival on this planet, as a monster and projecting its increase to be a threat for the entire man kind....
..And who will question the Nobel committee for choosing these manipulators for the prestigious prize
Here's to the crazy climate change, the misfit, the rebel, the troublemaker. It's not fond of rules and it has no respect for the status quo. You can misinterpret it, understand it, glorify or vilify it, about the only thing you can't do is ignore it, because it changes, always has and always will. It helps push the human race forward, and for that matter it pushes all living species forward. Without climate change, species would have no incentive to adapt and evolve. In climate change I see genius, because it's crazy enough to think it can change the world, and it does.
ReplyDeleteTHANK YOU for this blog and speaking the truth. I hope you know that there are many scientists in the U.S. that say the same thing. It is just that our news media is so corrupt that they have censored these scientists.
ReplyDeleteJust a montth ago, our PBS NewsHour stated that " “this huge team of scientists from all over the globe issued these unanimous warnings about the really extreme danger to the planet.”
Here are US scientists who are speaking up:
Dr. Richard Lindzen of MIT, served on IPCC: “"One of the things the scientific community is pretty agreed on is those things will have virtually no impact on climate no matter what the models say. So the question is do you spend trillions of dollars to have no impact? And that seems like a no brainer.”
Dr. Bill Gray, Professor Emeritus of Atmospheric Science at Colorado State University -- Many thousands of scientists from the US and around the globe do not accept the human-induced global warming hypothesis as it has been presented by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) reports over the last 15 years. The media has, in general, uncritically accepted the results of the IPCC and over-hyped the human aspects of the warming threat. This makes for better press than saying that the climate changes we have experienced are mostly natural. The contrary views of the many warming skeptics have been largely ignored and their motives denigrated. The alleged "scientific consensus" on this topic is bogus.
Dr. John R. Christy, a lead author on the IPCC, Professor of Atmospheric Science and Director of the Earth System Science Center at the University of Alabama--Huntsville: [comments from debate on 11 Feb., 2009]: --Our ignorance about the climate system is enormous, and policy makers need to know that. This is an extremely complex system, and thinking we can control it is hubris.
Lots of quotes here:
http://scienceandpublicpolicy.org/images/stories/papers/reprint/un_scientists_speakout.pdf
http://noconsensus.org/scientists/freeman-dyson.php